Intervention on location / photographic documentation 2026 (ongoing)

Entrar por la herida

My current obsessive search for crossforms in urban and natural environments is a way of exhausting their heavy symbolism. By looking at them repeatedly—where they have not been constructed as signs—the cross shifts from cultural image to structural condition: two axes intersecting, a point of passage. When the layers of meaning momentarily dissolve, the encounter is no longer with a symbol, but with a bare condition: a site where forces meet—vertical weight and horizontal extension, support and collapse. Not an image to be read, but a structure to be experienced. A primitive orientation in space. A threshold. But the dense symbolic charge of the cross resists this shift, holding the gaze in an unresolved tension between what it sees and what it knows.

This gesture is not about finding meaning, but about eroding it—approaching a limit where what is revealed is no longer cultural or narrative, but structural, not narrative, but ontological.

In this project, the cruciform is not imposed but uncovered. It emerges when matter or space is exposed, fractured, or destabilized. A diagram of tension, burden, and vulnerability. A geography of exposure.

Its lineage precedes Christianity—appearing in ancient cosmologies and Paleolithic engravings. An unresolved logic of intersection. In the twentieth century, it returned as matter—more scar than symbol. The work engages the built environment as a field of observation, attending to moments where structure becomes visible through damage, erosion, or abandonment. Configurations are not constructed, but found. Sometimes a minimal gesture activates them; sometimes nothing is done—the cross is simply recognized. The work moves between detection, recognition, and activation.

The cruciform appears not as a symbol, but as a structural relation that surfaces when a system is exposed. It is a diagram, not an image. It emerges when architecture opens or weakens—revealing its internal logic.

Surfaces do not restore what is lost. They register a gap—a residue. A presence of absence. The work unfolds close to these questions: What form does life take when meaning collapses? How long can one sustain a gaze into the abyss without retreating into myth?